Morning Hopefully

Friday, December 1, 2006

Humus sapiens/archive2

AS discussion moved (IYDM) to Alltel ringtones User talk:Humus sapiens/AS. -Lovely Tera Stevertigo/SteSamsung ringtones User_talk:Stevertigo/vertigo 16:22, 6 Jul 2004 PS - New comment on Jenny Reid VFD:MCOIATIPC.
: Thanks! Real ringtones Humus sapiens/←Ivana Fukalot User:Humus sapiens/Humus sapiens←Virgin mobile ringtones User talk:Humus sapiens/Talk 23:10, 6 Jul 2004

Hate Speech

You messaged me claiming I am guilty of inciting hate speech? Can I see proof of this? I have provided reputable sources for my quotes, of you are in dis-belief, look them up yourself.

:I have provided a reputable source, look it up.

DO NOT MOVE PAGES BY COPY AND PASTE

'''DO NOT MOVE PAGES BY COPY AND PASTE. IT DESTROYS THE EDIT HISTORY. USE THE MOVE COMMAND'''. I have repaired the damage. The Sperm Lover Viajero/Viajero 11:00, 5 Jul 2004

: The ''Move'' command was unavailable because I am not a sysadmin. I tried to undo the damage done by you earlier and would appreciate you undoing it yourself. No need to yell, thank you. Tracfone ringtones Humus sapiens/←Sasha Fucks Dasha User:Humus sapiens/Humus sapiens←Cingular Ringtones User talk:Humus sapiens/Talk 23:10, 6 Jul 2004

Hi, I noticed your vote in the previous VfD on schmucko according Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies and wanted to let you know that I have reopened the issue and wish for you to please cast your vote at often called WP:VFD#Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies/VfDtv up Naryathegreat/naryathegreat 23:51, Jul 6, 2004

Re:and arnolfo Hebrew language vs. "Canaanite language"

Hi, please see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_mediation#Request_for_assistance_in_a_conflict_between_users_regarding_Canaanite_and_Hebrew_linguistics_articles

Your input and interest would be appreciated. Thank you. wanted lopez IZAK/IZAK 09:22, 7 Jul 2004

*'''Update: The above discussion was moved to and shit Talk:Hebrew languages. Thanks for having gotten back to me. Your input would still be appreciated. Thanks again.''' at bugs IZAK/IZAK 07:04, 9 Jul 2004


''From my talk page:''Sorry for the delay. Okay, it's not really of use here to go back into the history with too much detail: Suffice it to say that you both represent poles in the spectrum, and that what you both produce will likely be ''considered by the other to be prejudiced or otherwise'' as biased... contd. -position offers Stevertigo/Steinterest in User_talk:Stevertigo/vertigo 21:56, 7 Jul 2004

:Response at my talk. arm and Stevertigo/Stefrom such User_talk:Stevertigo/vertigo 01:49, 8 Jul 2004

Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism

As you have been involved in the debate before, I though you might be interested in knowing that it has heated up again. disruption can Jayjg/Jayjg 23:13, 9 Jul 2004

About Simonides and straw-man arguments against Jews

I am becoming very concerned about the behaviour of Simonides; he has already declared himself an enemy of "Zionist" contributions to Wikipedia, (although he has little idea of what this word really means; he uses this word as slur word.) Simonides's distortion of the content of the anti-Zionism article (and others), and his distortion of the views of Jewish groups, are straw-man attacks. As you know, no mainstream Jewish denomination, organization or group has ever claimed that a criticism of an Israeli policy or government is anti-Semitism; no on here on Wikipedia here is saying that either. Simonides' repeated claims to the contrary are Jew-baiting strawman attacks. They are not only factually false (and thus have no place in an encyclopedia), but will only serve to encourage open anti-Semitism. This isn't about a disagreement on how to phrase facts; this is about his manufactoring of ''false'' "facts" in order to hurt others whom he disagrees with. Simonides' behaviour is out of line, and if he continues, we may need to bring this up on the Wiki-En list. basic garments RK/RK 13:42, Jul 12, 2004

E-mail address

You mentioned your e-mail address was here, but I couldn't find it. Where is it? rodgers had Jayjg/Jayjg 15:27, 13 Jul 2004

UNRWA

I've reworded yet again. Care to take another look? armstrong methods Ambivalenthysteria/Ambivalenthysteria 08:15, 15 Jul 2004

Mediation

Hello. most anecdotal User:Simonides/Simonides has requested mediation concerning, amongst others, the following articles, some of which you may have been involved with: group selected Anti-Semitism, responds in Anti-Zionism, car survey Modern anti-Semitism, fine creatures PLO, Hamas, and Media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Would you agree to discuss these issues with Simonides with the help of a mediator? If so, please respond at
Requests_for_mediation#User:Simonides_and_User:Jayjg.2C_User:RK.2C_User:Humus_sapiens_.2B_others/Requests for mediation or on User talk:Angela/my talk page. If there are any mediators you would rather not handle this case, please say so. There is a list of them at Mediation Committee.

Angela/Angela, member of the Mediation Committee, 05:53, 16 Jul 2004

WikiProject Hebrew languages

WikiProject Hebrew languages.
Please join WikiProject Hebrew languages
Your input will be crucial. IZAK/IZAK 08:28, 10 Aug 2004

You're quite welcome

I didn't feel I was doing anything deserving of thanks, but it's appreciated anyway! :) Cecropia/Cecropia / User talk:Cecropia/Talk 06:46, 23 Aug 2004

Image:Menorah7a.png
if you
claim Fair use/fair use, etc.) If you don't know
what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images
and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Edwinstearns/ — Edwinstearns/Edwin Stearns / User talk:Edwinstearns/Talk 22:33, 14 Dec 2004

*Done, thanks for pointing out.Humus sapiens/←User:Humus sapiens/Humus sapiens←User talk:Humus sapiens/Talk 08:46, 15 Dec 2004

:Hi, Hum[m]us. Could you also tag :Image:Weizmann and feisal 1918.jpg? I'm not sure if it is in the public domain in the EU, because the photographer must have died ←Humus sapiens/Humus sapiens←User talk:Humus sapiens/Talk 10:17, 16 Dec 2004

Hypocrites

I have told you before that I consider the intifada to be an asymmetric war. I do not believe every action of the Palestinians to be terrorism, although some, I agree, are. I have been absolutely consistent in my belief that civilians are not legitimate targets of war, regardless of who is fighting it or why. Please don't bore me by yet again citing the IDF code of conduct. Actions have always spoken louder than words. I thought I was clear that I believe both sides have carried out acts of terrorism. I believe shooting at a school is an act designed to cause terror in the civilian population and is indefensible. I believe attacking buses and discos are also acts of terror and also indefensible.

I don't think, though, that those who do the latter can be labelled "terrorists" and those who do the former not. As it happens, Humus, I would not support an article on the IDF's being labelled with the terrorism category, even though I do strongly believe the IDF has carried out acts of terror.

As for Israel's actions' all being in its defence, I do not believe that to be true, and I'm not going to start believing it because you harass me. As is so often the case in conflict, there is merit on both sides and bad on both sides. A due recognition of that on your part would not go amiss. Dr Zen/Dr Zen 23:25, 21 Dec 2004

: You keep bringing the same straw man argument. I am tired of repeating that yes, sometimes Israelis are wrong and sometimes they make tragic mistakes. Show me any war without mistakes, i.e. unintentional casualties. Why keep them to a different standard than other armies/nations? Here is your chance to show your evenhandedness. Humus sapiens/←User:Humus sapiens/Humus sapiens←User talk:Humus sapiens/Talk 09:57, 22 Dec 2004

"Unintentional casualties"? You shell a refugee camp, you know people will die. You shoot at a market or a school, you know people, including children will die. I'm not hypocrite enough to hide behind semantics. Seems you are. Dr Zen/Dr Zen 22:14, 22 Dec 2004

Input needed

Hi Humus: See the discussions taking place at Template talk:Jew#Simplifications?. Please provide your views. Thank you. IZAK/IZAK 08:00, 28 Dec 2004

Accusations of vandalism

You should know that Molloy has Vandalism_in_progress#Humus_sapiens/marked you as a vandal, citing conflicts on the Zionism article. I am not sure that this was a wise move on his part.User:Pharos/Pharos 12:39, 3 Jan 2005

project: The new antisemitism

I took the liberty to help a little with the project cleanup of the new antisemitism. I fixed an headline typo, added sub-headlines to "manifestions of new antisemitism" (content should be added) and reorganized the links section - adding Simon Wiesenthal center and the US state department July 1, 2003- Dec 15, 2004 report. Feel free to contact me on the talk page, I will be happy to help you with the project. MathKnight/MathKnight 13:33, 7 Jan 2005

P.S.: about the part of antisemitic cartoons - I seek info about the British's "The Independent" cartoon presenting Sharon eating a baby's head and about a New-Zealander cartoonist who was fired after a series of antisemitic cartoons he drew in the paper. MathKnight/MathKnight 13:33, 7 Jan 2005

Archived discussion with User:Blankfaze

... before he blanked the page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blankfaze&oldid=9232135]